AI Proposal Generator for Graphic Design

It is built around how design studios actually sell, not a blank text box. Waxe opens on the client's brand problem and the outcome they want, then lays out your recommended approach, scope of work, a phased timeline, and clear commercial terms. It frames revisions as capped rounds and spells out usage rights, source files, and licensing upfront. The result looks like the work of a studio whose whole value is visual craft, so a bespoke identity engagement never reads like a cheap template marketplace listing. You go from notes to a polished proposal in about five minutes for a few cents.

Every proposal Waxe drafts defines what a round of revisions actually is and caps how many are included in the fee. Instead of an open-ended promise, the scope of work names the deliverables, the number of concepts, and the review points where feedback is collected. Out-of-scope changes and extra rounds are flagged as billable in the commercial terms. That turns 'just tweak it again' into a clear conversation about scope rather than a quiet erosion of your margin. Clients sign knowing exactly what is and is not included.

Yes. Waxe writes the licensing and ownership language directly into the commercial terms and the final-artwork section, so it is agreed before work starts. The proposal states which assets transfer, what usage rights the client receives, and how source files and the working files are handled. It distinguishes the brand guidelines, asset templates, and final artwork from your underlying source files. That removes the awkward post-project dispute where a client assumes they own everything. The terms are spelled out while you still have leverage at the proposal stage.

That is the point. A plain, text-heavy quote undercuts a studio whose value proposition is visual craft, so waxTable designs the proposal as a branded document, not a wall of text. Moodboard direction, your colour and typography choices, and the structure of your scope are presented with the same care as your client work. It reads as a considered piece of design, which justifies a fixed project fee rather than inviting a price-only comparison. Prospects see craft on the first page instead of a spreadsheet.

Waxe builds the commercial terms around your model: a fixed fee tied to a defined scope and a set number of rounds. The proposal connects the fee to specific deliverables, the creative brief, the logo suite, the visual system, and the brand guidelines, so the number is anchored to value rather than hourly guesswork. Phased timelines and payment milestones can map to discovery, concepts, and final artwork. This helps clients who undervalue creative work see the strategy and rounds behind 'just a logo'. You present one clear figure for a clearly bounded engagement.